+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nova Micro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Micro leads with 11.8% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Nova Micro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Nova Micro is a language model developed by Amazon. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.0% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (92.3%), ARC-C (90.2%), Translation Set1→en COMET22 (88.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Amazon's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Nova Micro
Amazon
2024-11-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($0.14 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Input:$0.03
Output:$0.14
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:32.1%
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Average Score:43.8%(+11.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:32.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Avg Score:43.8%(+11.8%)
Providers:1