+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nova Micro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Micro leads with 13.1% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Nova Micro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Micro was created as an ultra-compact multimodal model, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Built to bring text and image understanding to edge devices and latency-sensitive applications, it extends Amazon's AI capabilities to minimal footprint scenarios.
1 month newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Nova Micro
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($0.14 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Input:$0.03
Output:$0.14
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:63.0%
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Average Score:76.1%(+13.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:63.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Avg Score:76.1%(+13.1%)
Providers:1