+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nova Pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Pro leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. Nova Pro offers 344.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $3.97 cheaper per million tokens. Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Nova Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Pro was developed as the flagship model in the Nova family, designed to provide advanced multimodal understanding across text, images, and other modalities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Amazon's most capable offering for enterprise applications.
1 month newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Nova Pro
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($3.97 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Input:$0.80
Output:$3.20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:63.0%
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Average Score:81.8%(+18.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:63.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Avg Score:81.8%(+18.9%)
Providers:1