+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 21.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 62.5K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $14.97 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
13 days newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($14.97 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:43.9%(+21.2%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:22.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:43.9%(+21.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:22.7%
Providers:2