+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 41.8% higher average benchmark score. o1-pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 82.5% across 2 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2024 (86.0%), GPQA (79.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:52.1%(+41.8%)
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:10.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:52.1%(+41.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:10.3%
Providers:0