+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-pro leads with 46.2% higher average benchmark score. o1-pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1-pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro was developed as an enhanced version of the o1 reasoning model, designed to provide extended reasoning capabilities with greater depth and reliability. Built for professionals and advanced users tackling complex analytical tasks, it offers enhanced thinking time and reasoning quality for the most demanding applications.
2 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:79.0%(+46.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:79.0%(+46.2%)
Providers:0