+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 33.6% higher average benchmark score. o3-mini offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $5.47 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
4 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($5.47 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:56.0%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:89.6%(+33.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:56.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:89.6%(+33.6%)
Providers:2