+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 18.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), HumanEval (88.4%), HellaSwag (85.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 days newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:30.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:49.5%(+18.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:30.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:49.5%(+18.6%)
Providers:0