+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads with 9.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 116.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $0.57 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
6 days newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($0.57 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:59.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:68.7%(+9.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:59.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:68.7%(+9.7%)
Providers:1