+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads with 32.1% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is a multimodal language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The model shows competitive results across 45 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (95.2%), VocalSound (93.9%), GSM8k (88.7%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 57 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:14.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:46.8%(+32.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:14.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:46.8%(+32.1%)
Providers:0