+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B leads with 21.0% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Qwen3 235B A22B is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen3 235B A22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B was developed as a large-scale model with 235 billion total parameters using a mixture-of-experts architecture activating 22 billion parameters. Built to provide frontier capabilities with computational efficiency through sparse activation, it represents Qwen's advancement into very large-scale model development.
7 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($0.17 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:56.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Average Score:77.0%(+21.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:56.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Avg Score:77.0%(+21.0%)
Providers:4