Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B - AI Comparison for Builders | airank.dev

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison

Qwen3 235B A22B leads with 27.8% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Qwen3 235B A22B is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen3 235B A22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.

Meta

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 235B A22B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 76.2% across 23 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (95.6%), GSM8k (94.4%), BBH (88.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.

7 months newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Input:$0.01

Output:$0.02($0.17 cheaper)

Qwen3 235B A22B

Input:$0.10

Output:$0.10

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Average performance across 33 common benchmarks

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Average Score:25.3%

Qwen3 235B A22B

Average Score:53.1%(+27.8%)

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

1 providers

DeepInfra

Throughput: 171.5 tok/s

Latency: 0.24ms

Qwen3 235B A22B

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Avg Score:25.3%

Providers:1

Qwen3 235B A22B

Avg Score:53.1%(+27.8%)

Providers:4