+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 27.9% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 124.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $1.62 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
11 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($1.62 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:55.1%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:83.0%(+27.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:55.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:83.0%(+27.9%)
Providers:1