+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 20.6% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.3% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (92.3%), DocVQA (90.1%), MGSM (86.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.45 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:46.3%(+20.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:25.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
5 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 24 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Together
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:46.3%(+20.6%)
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:25.7%
Providers:2