+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 10.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
1 month newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:73.8%(+10.0%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:63.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
5 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 24 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Together
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:73.8%(+10.0%)
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:63.8%
Providers:0