+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads with 2.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
4 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:70.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:73.0%(+2.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
5 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 24 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Together
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:70.9%
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:73.0%(+2.0%)
Providers:0