+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 19.3% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:44.9%(+19.3%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:25.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 2220 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 197 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:44.9%(+19.3%)
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:25.6%
Providers:0