+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-pro leads with 28.5% higher average benchmark score. o1-pro supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, o1-pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro was developed as an enhanced version of the o1 reasoning model, designed to provide extended reasoning capabilities with greater depth and reliability. Built for professionals and advanced users tackling complex analytical tasks, it offers enhanced thinking time and reasoning quality for the most demanding applications.
11 days newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:50.5%
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:79.0%(+28.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 2220 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 197 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:50.5%
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:79.0%(+28.5%)
Providers:0