Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct offers 224.0K more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
6 days newer

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06

Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Phi 4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Phi 4
Phi 4
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Phi 4

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Phi 4
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together

Phi 4
DeepInfra