+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct leads with 15.9% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The model shows competitive results across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.4%), GSM8k (83.9%), MBPP (83.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:30.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:45.9%(+15.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 2220 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 197 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:30.0%
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:45.9%(+15.9%)
Providers:0