+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 29.2% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
1 days newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:66.7%(+29.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:37.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:66.7%(+29.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:37.5%
Providers:1