+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 33.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
3 months newer
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:77.5%(+33.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:43.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:77.5%(+33.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:43.7%
Providers:0