+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 1.1% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
6 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:91.3%(+1.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:90.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:91.3%(+1.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:90.2%
Providers:4