+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 18.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
19 days newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.37 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:77.3%(+18.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:58.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 83.59 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 63.03 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms
Groq
Throughput: 307.3 tok/s
Latency: 0.27ms
Lambda
Throughput: 93.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:77.3%(+18.8%)
Providers:7
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:58.5%
Providers:1