+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 8.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
19 days newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:74.7%(+8.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:66.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 83.59 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 63.03 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms
Groq
Throughput: 307.3 tok/s
Latency: 0.27ms
Lambda
Throughput: 93.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:74.7%(+8.6%)
Providers:7
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:66.1%
Providers:0