+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Maverick vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 22.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
7 months newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:79.0%(+22.8%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:56.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 83.59 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 63.03 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms
Groq
Throughput: 307.3 tok/s
Latency: 0.27ms
Lambda
Throughput: 93.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:79.0%(+22.8%)
Providers:7
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:56.2%
Providers:0