+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Maverick vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 13.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.9M more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
6 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.47 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:79.7%(+13.0%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:66.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 83.59 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 63.03 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms
Groq
Throughput: 307.3 tok/s
Latency: 0.27ms
Lambda
Throughput: 93.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:79.7%(+13.0%)
Providers:7
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:66.7%
Providers:1