+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 7.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2-VL 72B was developed as a large vision-language model, designed to handle multimodal tasks combining visual and textual understanding. Built with 72 billion parameters for integrated vision and language processing, it enables applications requiring sophisticated analysis of images alongside text.
7 months newer
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-08-29
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:74.8%(+7.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Average Score:67.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
2023-06-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 83.59 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 63.03 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms
Groq
Throughput: 307.3 tok/s
Latency: 0.27ms
Lambda
Throughput: 93.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:74.8%(+7.5%)
Providers:7
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Avg Score:67.3%
Providers:0