+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Small
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout offers 19.9M more tokens in context window than Mistral Small. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small was created as an efficient model offering, designed to provide capable language understanding with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications while maintaining quality, it enables Mistral's technology in scenarios where resource efficiency is valued.
6 months newer
Mistral Small
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($0.42 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 76.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.31ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 116.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
Groq
Throughput: 776.1 tok/s
Latency: 1.08ms
Lambda
Throughput: 139.7 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:6
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1