+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Scout vs Nova Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 1.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Nova Lite. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
4 months newer
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24($0.08 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:73.3%(+1.4%)
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:71.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 76.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.31ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 116.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
Groq
Throughput: 776.1 tok/s
Latency: 1.08ms
Lambda
Throughput: 139.7 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:73.3%(+1.4%)
Providers:6
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:71.9%
Providers:1