Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Micro leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Nova Micro. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Nova Micro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
Amazon
Nova Micro is a language model developed by Amazon. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.0% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (92.3%), ARC-C (90.2%), Translation Set1→en COMET22 (88.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Amazon's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Nova Micro
Amazon
2024-11-20
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Llama 4 Scout
Nova Micro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
Llama 4 Scout
Nova Micro
Available providers and their performance metrics
Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Llama 4 Scout
Nova Micro
Llama 4 Scout
Nova Micro
Together
Nova Micro
Bedrock