Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Pro leads with 35.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.4M more tokens in context window than Nova Pro. Llama 4 Scout is $3.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Nova Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
Amazon
Nova Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Amazon. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.2% across 27 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (94.8%), GSM8k (94.8%), DocVQA (93.5%). It supports a 600K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Amazon's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Nova Pro
Amazon
2024-11-20
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Llama 4 Scout
Nova Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 33 common benchmarks
Llama 4 Scout
Nova Pro
Available providers and their performance metrics
Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Llama 4 Scout
Nova Pro
Llama 4 Scout
Nova Pro
Together
Nova Pro
Bedrock