+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B leads with 8.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Qwen3 235B A22B. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Qwen3 235B A22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B was developed as a large-scale model with 235 billion total parameters using a mixture-of-experts architecture activating 22 billion parameters. Built to provide frontier capabilities with computational efficiency through sparse activation, it represents Qwen's advancement into very large-scale model development.
24 days newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.10($0.18 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:64.7%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Average Score:73.0%(+8.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 76.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.31ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 116.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
Groq
Throughput: 776.1 tok/s
Latency: 1.08ms
Lambda
Throughput: 139.7 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:64.7%
Providers:6
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Avg Score:73.0%(+8.3%)
Providers:4