+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B leads with 19.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Qwen3 30B A3B. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Qwen3 30B A3B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B was created with a mixture-of-experts architecture featuring 30 billion total parameters and 3 billion active parameters. Built to provide strong capabilities with efficient inference through sparse activation, it balances performance with practical computational requirements.
24 days newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($0.02 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:45.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:64.2%(+19.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 76.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.31ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 116.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
Groq
Throughput: 776.1 tok/s
Latency: 1.08ms
Lambda
Throughput: 139.7 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:45.0%
Providers:6
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:64.2%(+19.2%)
Providers:3