Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 14.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.9M more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Llama 4 Scout is $1.27 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
5 months newer

Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 4 Scout

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Llama 4 Scout

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita

Llama 4 Scout

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Llama 4 Scout

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Together

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita