+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Magistral Medium vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 14.7% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
6 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:70.8%(+14.7%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:56.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:70.8%(+14.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:56.1%
Providers:1