+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Magistral Medium vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 18.8% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
1 month newer
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:70.8%(+18.8%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:70.8%(+18.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%
Providers:0