+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral NeMo Instruct leads with 7.0% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral NeMo Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:27.3%
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:34.3%(+7.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:27.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:34.3%(+7.0%)
Providers:2