+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct leads with 10.9% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (87.6%), HumanEval (84.8%), MT-Bench (83.5%). The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:27.3%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:38.2%(+10.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:27.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:38.2%(+10.9%)
Providers:2