+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
MedGemma 4B IT leads with 7.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, MedGemma 4B IT is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.9% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (81.0%), TriviaQA (80.5%), MMMU (59.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:34.1%(+7.9%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:26.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:34.1%(+7.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:26.2%
Providers:1