+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads with 28.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.9%), AI2D (92.9%), HumanEval Plus (92.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:18.6%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:47.5%(+28.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:18.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:47.5%(+28.9%)
Providers:0