+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 42.7% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 38 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:10.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:53.5%(+42.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:10.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:53.5%(+42.7%)
Providers:0