+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.3% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ScienceQA (91.3%), POPE (86.1%), MMBench (81.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:25.6%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:38.4%(+12.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:25.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:38.4%(+12.8%)
Providers:0