+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 22.4% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:20.5%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:42.9%(+22.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:20.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:42.9%(+22.4%)
Providers:1