+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
MedGemma 4B IT leads with 20.5% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, MedGemma 4B IT is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
20 days newer
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:41.0%(+20.5%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:20.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:41.0%(+20.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:20.4%
Providers:0