+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 23.2% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
20 days newer
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:22.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:45.9%(+23.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:22.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:45.9%(+23.2%)
Providers:0