+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 14.9% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (93.8%), AIME 2024 (81.4%), LiveBench (74.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
21 days newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:25.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:40.5%(+14.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
3 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:25.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:40.5%(+14.9%)
Providers:3