+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Ministral 8B Instruct vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 7.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Ministral 8B was developed as a compact yet capable model from Mistral AI, designed to provide strong instruction-following with just 8 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring efficient deployment while maintaining reliable performance, it represents Mistral's smallest production-ready offering.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
1 month newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Ministral 8B Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-10-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Ministral 8B Instruct
Average Score:62.1%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:69.9%(+7.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Ministral 8B Instruct
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.18ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
+
+
+
+
Ministral 8B Instruct
Avg Score:62.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:69.9%(+7.8%)
Providers:0