+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Large 2 vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Large 2 leads with 17.0% higher average benchmark score. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is $7.80 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Mistral Large 2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 was introduced as the second generation of Mistral's flagship model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities across diverse language tasks. Built with enhanced reasoning, coding, and multilingual abilities, it represents Mistral's most advanced offering for enterprise and demanding applications.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Mini was developed by Microsoft as a small language model designed to deliver impressive performance despite its compact size. Built with efficiency in mind, it demonstrates that capable language understanding and generation can be achieved with fewer parameters, making AI more accessible for edge and resource-constrained deployments.
1 month newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.10($7.80 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Average Score:89.7%(+17.0%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Average Score:72.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Avg Score:89.7%(+17.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Avg Score:72.7%
Providers:1