+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 192.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
6 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($0.09 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2