+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct leads with 9.7% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
8 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:70.9%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:80.6%(+9.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:70.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:80.6%(+9.7%)
Providers:0