+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-mini leads with 17.2% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 62.5K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $14.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
1 month newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($14.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:85.2%(+17.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:85.2%(+17.2%)
Providers:2