+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. o3-mini offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $5.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
6 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($5.20 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:86.9%(+18.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:86.9%(+18.9%)
Providers:2